Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Selesnya Cage | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Gruul Dinosaurs | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Sultai Roots | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Mono Green Ramp | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Golgari Midrange | vitorcarvalho01 | 7-2 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | pnutz47 | 6-2 | None |
| Golgari Midrange | dr4ken | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Roots , Bant Enchantments , Bant Gearhulk , Domain Ramp , Domain Zur Overlords , Elves , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Counters
Meta Performance Analysis
Llanowar Elves ranks #55 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 14%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 65.6%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Llanowar Elves is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 45.17 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.0%. Llanowar Elves has a win rate of 75.3%, making it 1.0% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phyrexian Censor | Creature — Phyrexian Wizard | 9 | 78.3% | 5 |
| Leyline Axe | Artifact — Equipment | 5 | 75.0% | 2 |
| Skrelv, Defector Mite | Legendary Artifact Creature — Phyrexian Mite | 15 | 71.3% | 6 |
| Scrollshift | Instant | 6 | 70.6% | 3 |
| Tolsimir, Midnight's Light | Legendary Creature — Elf Scout | 11 | 69.4% | 4 |
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 7 | 68.7% | 3 |
| Kogla and Yidaro | Legendary Creature — Ape Dinosaur Turtle | 5 | 68.1% | 2 |
| Sunder the Gateway | Sorcery | 7 | 67.6% | 3 |
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 41 | 66.8% | 16 |
| Elspeth, Storm Slayer | Legendary Planeswalker — Elspeth | 7 | 66.3% | 3 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Llanowar Elves than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surrak, Elusive Hunter | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior | 3 | 7 | 92.9% | 76.3% | +16.6% |
| Lumbering Worldwagon | Artifact — Vehicle | 3 | 7 | 100.0% | 87.6% | +12.4% |
| Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 1 | 5 | 79.3% | 72.5% | +6.8% |
| Pawpatch Recruit | Creature — Rabbit Warrior | 1 | 9 | 80.6% | 74.2% | +6.4% |
| Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 4 | 8 | 78.0% | 72.7% | +5.3% |
| Haywire Mite | Artifact Creature — Insect | 1 | 11 | 81.4% | 76.3% | +5.1% |
| Shoot the Sheriff | Instant | 2 | 11 | 83.3% | 79.1% | +4.3% |
| Brightglass Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 4 | 6 | 80.6% | 76.5% | +4.1% |
| Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 18 | 76.6% | 73.5% | +3.1% |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 2 | 6 | 79.5% | 76.5% | +3.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Golgari Midrange | 600 | 77.2% | 45.4% |
| Golgari Demons | 475 | 87.2% | 47.8% |
| Selesnya Cage | 253 | 100.0% | 49.1% |
| Unknown Archetype | 35 | 9.6% | 35.0% |
| Unclassified | 27 | 13.3% | 24.4% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.